Philosophical Outlook of Ancient China Essay

The light speed Schools of Thought was an era of great cultural and quick expansion in China that lasted from 770 to 222 BCE. In almost 500 BCE, after the Zhou state alter and China moved in to the period of contend states, the classic period of Chinese philosophy, known as the Golden Age, began. This period saw the rise of legion(predicate) Chinese philosophers and academics. Many of the great Chinese texts ease up intensely enriched Chinese alivenessstyles and social awareness up to the present day.However, of the bity tutors founded at this clip and during the attendant Warring States Period, the three most influential ones were Legalism, Taoism, and Confucianism. Legalism, the political philosophy concerned with the most effective manner of governing orderliness, is exemplified in the style, attitude, and philosophical first moment of the passage. Legalists acquaint humans as inherently evil and run toward criminal and selfish behavior. Thus, if humans are on t he wholeowed to absorb in their natural proclivities, the result will be conflict and social dis prescribe. They essential be determine and guided.If humans are not straightened and bent deal the wood in the passage, which must be changed to be useful, they will not fit the proper comment and always be essenti onlyy bad or ineffectual. Legalists lead say, Those who face capacity for their work will be promised and rewarded, those who show incapacity will be punished (Waley 178- 179) . The manipulation of the wood with its shaping whitethorn be compared to the rewards and penaltys given to the wad in a legalist society to maintain order in the community. The idea of depending on the legality is besides imperative throughout the passage.The passage reveals that laws of the state must not be neglected, indicating their importance and necessity. It may be simply stated, the legalist does not prize morality, he prizes the law ( Waley, 155). This shows that at that place is an attitude of placing the law supra alone in this society. Thus, the passage indicates for the mentioned reasons above that it belongs to the legalist naturalise of thought. As a result of these legalist beliefs there was a great emphasis placed on absolute human behavior through written law rather than through ritual, custom or ethics. some other school of thought was based on a scheme of ethics. This school of thought was known as Confucianism. These teachings placed a high repute on learning and devotion to family, as well as a display of peace and justice. The passage does not represent Confucianism because this school of thought emphasizes the goodness of every last(predicate) people. Contradicting this belief, the passage indicates, the enlightened ruler does not value people who are naturally good. Waley reveals a intercourse between the King of Wei and Mencius. Mencius concerns himself with providing the king with something of profit.In result the King consecra tes to him, All that I realize to say to you is concerned with goodness and right, and nothing else at all (90). This indicates that there is a strong base of faithfulness and goodness that creates the foundation of Confucianism, and the main attitude toward others were that they were fill up with righteousness. The attitude of cosmos naturally good disregard too be seen as people cultivate conditions of freedom (Waley, 87). This means that it is human nature, which is responsible for nurturing and promoting the growth.It is the character of all human bes to do the right thing that is fundamentally full of decency and honesty. In this way, Confucianism was primarily a system of ethical precepts for the proper management of society. The last school of thought is characterized by inaction, the vainness of knowledge, spirituality, and the guidance by nature and instinct. This school of thought is known as Taoism. The passage does not share any of the above-motioned characteri stics of being middle of the road. In fact, the passage contradicts this accompaniment philosophy quite clearly.It states, the ruler who has the technique does not follow the good that happens by chance. In a Taoist society people believe in inaction as seen in the story of the man who spent every moment in life caring for his horse. One day, the story goes, a fly attached itself to the animal, and this man scotched it. He took an action, and as a result of taking an action the horse buzz offn by surprise, it became severely injured and tore its boob and bruised its head (Waley, 77). This proves, according to Taoism that you should not seek to instruct things into your hands.If the care giver of the horse never would have made an effort to help the horse it would have been no better off or worsened off than it was before, it would just be. This philosophy is also seen in another part of Waley in which it is said that, You will stumble, you will stagger, you will topple and stifle (76). The way of the Taoist is to achieve happiness is by learning to go with the flow. Instead of trying to let things done the hard way, people should take the time to figure out the natural, or easy way to do things, and then everything would get done more than simply.This shows the beliefs of Taoism, that not acting, but just functioning and being, by seeking a higher reality indoors ones self, is enough. In conclusion, after considering all the schools of thought, it can be said that the passage is hard believed to belong to the Legalist school of thought. Legalism portrays humans as obtuse, useless individuals that are inherently bad. The emphasis on laws, punishment and reward are shown by the straitening and bending of society to fit a particular, useful mold.The reasoning for the passage not belonging to either the Taoist or Confucian schools of thought are because there is no emphasis on goodness as seen in Confucianism. However, it does show how people as be ing inherently bad. It also shows how people should act and take matters into their own hands, which derives from the Taoist philosophy of staying neutral. Therefore, the style, attitude, and philosophical outlook of the passage would be legalism because it is clearly portrayed by the values, attitude and the teachings illustrated in the passage.